ci
Nominas
1 bloOrde (90)
Descusar case
who desire
7.11
35
J Bevar Khan
to take up exploquent
مشهد
e
who has been refacer admission HKJ to the Colors
1. Mr. Orde's letter raises the specific
question of the case of Benares Khan and the general
Colonial
question of the co-operation by the/Governments in the
Far East and the supervision of Indian emigrants to
China.
2.
enak. 9 in (1)
probably
Benares Khan was refused admission to
Hong Kong in spite of the fact that he deposited
$100 at the Consulate General in Canton and had a
definite promise of employment from one Firdos Khan
in Hong Kong. The grounds for the refusal included
the character of his prospective employer, who is
suspected of being an agitator, and use was made of
the provisions of Part II of the Ordinance No. 8 of
1934 (Immigration and Passport Ordinance), in view
of the fact that Benares Khan did not possess a
passport or other valid travel document. This decision
was no doubt influenced by the fact that in view of
the deepening economic depression the authorities are
unwilling to admit any persons likely to become
unemployed and a charge on public funds.
3. As regards X in the first enclosure to
Mr. Orde's letter, it is one thing to have suspicions
of the activities of Firdos Khan and to be disinclined
to stretch the Passport Regulations at his request;
and quite another to have sufficient cut and dried
evidence to justify his expulsion from Hong Kong.
4.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.